Chief Justice John Roberts in Favor of Business終審法院首席法官約翰羅伯茨在有利於業務

US Chief Justice John Roberts in his first Supreme Court opinion wrote a nine-page opinion that said Franklin Resources Inc. and another company don’t have to pay the legal fees two New Mexico consumers incurred in a pre-trial skirmish over the proper forum for their lawsuit and thus produced a narrow but unanimous victory for businesses, limiting the ability of consumers to win attorneys’ fees.美國首席大法官約翰羅伯茨在他的首最高法院的意見,寫了9頁,認為說,富蘭克林資源公司和另一家公司沒有支付法律費用的兩個新的墨西哥消費者的費用在一個審判前的交戰過的適當論壇。他們的訴訟,並因此產生了狹隘的,但一致的勝利,企業,限制的能力,以贏得消費者的律師費。

The dispute concerned a law that lets defendants shift lawsuits from state to federal court in some circumstances.糾紛涉及的法律,讓被告的訴訟,轉移,從國家到聯邦法院,在某些情況下。 Businesses often use that approach in the hope of getting a more favorable hearing before a federal judge and jury.企業通常使用這種方法,在希望獲得一個更加有利的聽證會之前,一個聯邦法官和陪審團。

The issue for Roberts and the court was whether legal fees generally should go to plaintiffs who successfully argue against a bid to move a case into federal court.問題羅伯茨和法院是否法律費用,一般應到原告誰成功地反對為了動議的案件到聯邦法院。 Roberts said fees should be awarded only when a litigant ”lacked an objectively reasonable basis” for arguing in favor of a federal forum.羅伯茨說,費應予賠償只有當一個律師代表的訴訟人“缺乏一個客觀合理的基礎”為爭論,贊成的一個聯邦論壇。

The decision upheld a lower court ruling favoring Franklin and Century-National Insurance Co. The two companies are fighting a class-action lawsuit filed by Gerald and Juana Martin over auto loans and insurance.決定維持下級法院的裁決偏袒富蘭克林和世紀-全國保險有限公司兩家公司正在爭取一類訴訟,由杰拉爾德和胡安馬丁以上的汽車貸款和保險。

Link鏈接

Filed under提起下 General Law一般規律 |

You may also like to read您也可以想讀

Leave a Reply離開的答复



Please enter the code shown below ( to verify that you are human ) before you click Submit Comment . 請輸入代碼如下所示(以驗證您是否人類) ,然後單擊提交評論


Protected by保護 Comment Guard Pro評論民警衛隊親