The Legalizer

December 12th, 2006 A class action lawsuit has been filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of investors who purchased the publicly traded securities of Warner Chilcott during the period from September 20, 2006 through and including September 26, 2006, alleged that defendants violated Sections 11, 12(a) and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933. In details it charges that Company's Registration Statement and Prospectus issued in connection with the IPO failed to disclose that shortly prior to the IPO, the Company had stopped shipping Ovcon 35, Warner Chilcott's top selling birth control pill and a primary source of revenue for the Company.

December 6th, 2006 Lawsuits seeking class action status have been filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of shareholders who purchased or otherwise acquired the securities of Warner Chilcott Ltd. during the period September 20, 2006 through September 26, 2006.

November 2nd, 2006 A class action lawsuit has been filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, on behalf of purchasers of the common stock of Warner Chilcott, Limited on the Company's Initial Public Offering effective September 20, 2006 and on the open market between September 20, 2006 and September 25, 2006, inclusive, alleged Warner, Roger Boissonneault and Paul Herendeen with violations of Section 11,12(a)(2) and 15 of the Securities Act by issuing a series of materially false and misleading statements to the market during the Class Period concerning Ovcon 35 pill. Specifically, the complaint alleges that in the prospectus for the IPO, defendants made false and misleading statements about the Company's determination, made prior to the date of the prospectus, to discontinue immediately shipments of Ovcon 35 when it commenced shipments and sale, in September 2006, prior to the date of the prospectus, of its generic chewable version of Ovcon 35 (the ``Ovcon Chewable'') and the negative impact that determination would have on the Company's sales revenues for the remainder of 2006 and thereafter.

April 10th, 2006 US District Judge Shirley Wohl Kram has approved a $2.65 billion class-action settlement which resulted from lawsuits brought by shareholders who complained that AOL improperly accounted for dozens of advertising transactions, inflating revenue for 15 quarters between 1998 and 2002, against AOL and Time Warner. According to the deal approved by Kram, Time Warner will pay the bulk of the settlement while its auditor, Ernst & Young LLP, will pay $100 million.

January 8th, 2006 America Online Inc. which is part of Time Warner Inc.

June 4th, 2007 A class action lawsuit has been filed in State Court of New York against the pet retailer Petco and the pet food distributor Pet Food Experts Inc. The lawsuit alleged that he pet chew Greenies was harmful to dogs and that the manufacturer knew this but did nothing to warn consumers.

July 6th, 2007 A lawsuit seeking class action status has been filed in the District Court of Tel-Aviv against Partner Communications Company Ltd., alleging that the company over-billed one million subscribers. If the lawsuit is certified as a class action, the total amount claimed from Partner is estimated by the plaintiff to be approximately NIS 1.5 billion.

June 4th, 2007 A class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of all person or entities who purchased shares of Netlist, Inc. in connection with the Company's Initial Public Offering ("IPO") on or about November 30, 2006, or who purchased shares thereafter in the open market.