Class Action Settlement Over iPod’s Rechargeable Battery Being Appealed
Apple representatives confirmed that the settlement to a class-action lawsuit brought by customers over claims that the company misrepresented the capabilities of the iPod’s rechargeable battery was being appealed, though the company said it had not filed the appeal.
A notice posted on the iPod Settlement Web site says the appeal was filed on October 24, 2005 in the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo.
As a result, settlement benefits will not be provided unless and until the appeal is resolved. This process, the Web site notes, could take an extended period of time (up to a year or more).
The settlement was approved by a San Mateo, California County judge in late August 2005, offered users several forms of compensation including a store credit, voucher, partial compensation for a battery replacement if one has been made already, or extended warranty coverage — depending on the age of the iPod and the particular circumstances.
Filed under Class Action, General Law, Settlements
You may also like to read
- Apple Settles iPod Battery Class Action Lawsuit
- iPod Battery Class Action Settlement in Its Last Stage
- Apple Class Action Lawsuit Review
- Best of The Fortnight Ending 20th November 2005
- iPhone Batteries Third Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against Apple
- Bentonville based retail giant decides for settlement with former employee
- Lemon Law Suit by Used Car Salesman Dismissed by Court
- Dollar Financial Corp. Agreed to Settle Three California Lawsuits
- $225,000 Awarded in a Malpractice Lawsuit
- Behr Dayton Thermal Plant is to face class action lawsuit

































November 22nd, 2005 at 8:42 am
[...] Apple representatives confirmed that the settlement to a class-action lawsuit brought by customers over claims that the company misrepresented the capabilities of the iPod’s rechargeable battery was being appealed, though the company said it had not filed the appeal, whereas, Independence Regional Health Center compensated $2:5 million for malpractice [...]