Gov’t says it owes nothing in Indian trust suit
WASHINGTON — The government told a federal appeals court Monday it owes nothing to 500,000 American Indians and their heirs who claim they were cheated out of billions of dollars in land royalties.
The long-running suit, first filed 13 years ago, is before the U.S. Court of Appeals after both sides appealed a lower court’s decision last year that the Indian plaintiffs are entitled to $455 million — far less than the $47 billion or higher they say they are owed.
The suit claims the Indians were swindled out of royalties overseen by the Interior Department since 1887 for things like oil, gas, grazing and timber.
Indian plaintiffs, led by Elouise Cobell, a member of the Blackfeet Tribe from Montana, have argued that the government has improperly accounted for the money and should pay it back with some form of interest.
The government appeal contends the court does not have the jurisdiction to award the money at all, pointing to a district court decision last year that the task of accounting for the trust money was ultimately impossible. They have also pointed to the lower court’s ruling that Congress has not given the Interior Department enough money to do a full accounting.
In 1994, Congress demanded that the Interior Department fulfill an obligation to account for money received and distributed. Two years later, when account statements still had not been reconciled, Cobell joined with others in suing.
Because many of the records have been lost, it has since been up to the court to decide how to best estimate how much individual Indians should be paid, or how the money should be accounted for. Many of them are nearing the end of their lives.
At issue in the trial’s most recent phase was how much of the royalty money was withheld from the Indian plaintiffs over the years, and whether it was held in the U.S. Treasury at a benefit to the government. U.S. District Judge James Robertson said last year that plaintiffs did not successfully argue that it was.
Robertson originally intended to begin a new phase of the trial that would determine how and to whom the government should award the money. But he said at an August status hearing that he would allow appeals now so the process would not be delayed further.
The class-action suit deals with individual Indians’ lands and covers about 500,000 Indians and their heirs. Several tribes have sued separately, claiming mismanagement of their lands.
Filed under Court, Government, Judiciary, Legal Proceedings | Tags: Asia, Claim, Congress, India, Lost, North America, South Asia, sued, Suing, United States, Us-indian-money, Washington | Comment Below
Related?
Appeals court considers if American Indians entitled to millions or billions in trust suitMay 11th, 2009 Appeals court hears Indian trust caseWASHINGTON — A federal appeals court will consider whether American Indian plaintiffs are entitled to $455 million in a long-running case involving claims the government cheated them out of land royalties. The 13-year lawsuit claims the Indians were swindled out of billions of dollars in oil, gas, grazing, timber and other royalties overseen by the Interior Department since 1887.
Lawyer: Iran to free jailed American journalist after court suspends jail termMay 11th, 2009 Lawyer: Iran to free jailed American journalistTEHRAN, Iran — An American journalist jailed in Iran will be freed Monday and can leave the country immediately, her lawyer said Monday after an appeals court suspended her eight-year prison sentence. Roxana Saberi, a 32-year-old dual American-Iranian national, was convicted last month of spying for the U.S.
Apex court wants list of steps taken to protect Indians abroadJune 22nd, 2009 NEW DELHI - The Supreme Court Monday asked the central government to list the steps taken to ensure the safety and security of Indians abroad after reports of alleged racial attacks on students studying in Australia. A vacation bench of Justice Dalveer Bhandari and Justice Asok Kumar Ganguly asked the government to file a reply by June 26.
Wall Street Banks Securities Class Action Lawsuit RejectedDecember 6th, 2006 The Federal Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Manhattan has rejected securities class action lawsuit against Wall Street banks, accused of manipulating the prices of initial public offerings of technology companies. The investment banks faced the prospect of making payments of billions of dollars to settle the accusations, if they chose not to risk a trial involving potentially millions of investors, the paper reported, citing lawyers involved in the case.
Bankruptcy trustee sues Madoff's wife for tens of millions of dollars in fraud moneyJuly 29th, 2009 Trustee sues Madoff's wife over 'life of splendor'NEW YORK — The trustee overseeing the liquidation of Bernard Madoff's assets has sued the disgraced financier's wife, asking for nearly $45 million spent on a "life of splendor."
Trustee Irving H. Picard spelled out his claims in a lawsuit filed Wednesday against Ruth Madoff in U.S.
How Can One File Medical Malpractice Lawsuit?August 2nd, 2006 How can one file medical malpractice lawsuit?
In medical malpractice lawsuit the plaintiff can files his suit in the state where the malpractice occurred, or sometimes where the defendant resides, and not where the patient moved afterwards. In most states you will have a right to a jury trial if you want one.
Bankruptcy trustee sues Madoff's wife for ill-gotten money used for a "life of splendor"July 29th, 2009 Trustee sues Madoff's wife for nearly $45MNEW YORK — The trustee overseeing the liquidation of Bernard Madoff's assets sued the disgraced money manager's wife on Wednesday, asking for nearly $45 million that he says was spent on "a life of splendor."
Trustee Irving H. Picard spelled out his claims in a lawsuit against Ruth Madoff in U.S.
Pa. court rules former Drifters manager can recover money from promoters who used group's nameJuly 7th, 2009 Pa. court rules in favor of ex-Drifters managerNEWARK, N.J. — A federal court says a former manager of 1950s doo-wop group The Drifters could be entitled to millions of dollars from concert promoters who've infringed on the band's trademark.
